Apple has a big chal­lenge. And, even if you don’t use Apple prod­ucts, you and your com­pa­ny have a prob­lem, too. You see, find­ing your next is not an option. That is one of the core mes­sages in my most recent e‑book, announced last week [link].e-book icon

Just ask John Scul­ley. Or Michael Spindler. Or Gil Ame­lio. “Who?” you ask. They were three CEOs of Apple who, for dif­fer­ent rea­sons, failed to find the right “next” for Apple. It was 1997, when Steve Jobs (one of the co-founders) returned as CEO, that Apple start­ed down the path that led to iMacs, iPods, iTunes and all that the com­pa­ny is now famous for. But 2014 will approach two decades after the Steve Jobs’ Apple renais­sance. And peo­ple are won­der­ing if the cur­rent CEO, Tim Cook, can answer cor­rect­ly the same ques­tion Steve Jobs faced: “What’s next?”

That’s why I said in my last post that Apple does not have a present-tense prob­lem: the num­bers the com­pa­ny recent­ly post­ed are impres­sive. But Apple sure has a future-tense prob­lem. Con­sid­er:

Alex Rosen­berg (@CNBCAlex) report­ed recent­ly that “Famed investor Marc Faber believes that Apple is a trou­bled com­pa­ny mak­ing an array of friv­o­lous prod­ucts — and for that rea­son could be on the road to bank­rupt­cy.” [link]

One rea­son, per­haps, that Faber and oth­ers believe what they do is that Apple has yet to put for­ward a gen­uine game-chang­ing con­cept of tele­vi­sion. It has, say many, been sit­ting on old ideas too long. What hap­pens, some say, when every­one who’s going to buy an iPhone or an iPad (Apple’s two largest prod­uct lines by sales) has done so? Can Apple sur­vive main­ly by peo­ple upgrad­ing what they already own? Not like­ly. Thus, the grow­ing din for a new Apple TV, not the com­put­er-to-TV appli­ance it now sells.

Travis Hoium says that Apple could be eclipsed by Net­flix in this regard [link]:

Before Steve Jobs died, he had a vision of an inte­grat­ed tele­vi­sion set, and he told biog­ra­ph­er Wal­ter Isaac­son he had “final­ly cracked it.” Two years lat­er, Apple has added a few apps to the Apple TV, but there’s still no iTV, no stream­ing sub­scrip­tion, and no vis­i­ble plan to upend the cable busi­ness.

So far, Net­flix appears to be clos­er to upend­ing the TV mar­ket.

Old, broken TVI just spot­ted an inter­view on Bloomberg TV between host Emi­ly Chang and Sur­vey­Mon­key CEO Dave Gold­berg. The sub­ject: “Has Apple Lost Its Cool Fac­tor?” [link] But just go to YouTube and type that ques­tion in and you will find many ask­ing the same ques­tion in many dif­fer­ent ways.

On the oth­er hand, many are spec­u­lat­ing that Apple will soon daz­zle every­one with a TV expe­ri­ence unlike any oth­er. Steve Kovach (@stevekovach) report­ed on 22 Octo­ber that “Ana­lyst Says Apple Will Launch A 65-Inch Tele­vi­sion Set With ‘Frame­less’ Design In 2014.” [link] Matthew Pan­zari­no (@Panzer) is opti­mistic a new TV con­cept from Apple could be an “ouroboros”, an eter­nal­ly renew­ing enti­ty inside every­one’s home, but he’s also won­der­ing what’s tak­ing Apple so long [link]:

Apple has been ‘pulling the string’ on the Apple TV for sev­en years now. Think about that one for a minute: it’s had a set-top box since before the iPhone.

Dur­ing that time, the land­scape of online video enter­tain­ment has com­plete­ly changed, large­ly as a result of the iPhone, iPad and iTunes Store. While Apple has a long way to go in order to make the Apple TV a decent solu­tion for coun­tries out­side of the US, it has made some progress and con­tin­ues to very slow­ly iter­ate on the orig­i­nal premise of an in-home media stream­ing device.

A large part of that is iCloud, which now allows users to watch any pur­chas­es they’ve made from iTunes on any device, includ­ing ATV. But there’s still a lot of work to be done if the device is going to become a major pil­lar of Apple’s busi­ness, as I believe that it could be — and should be if cards are played right.

Peter Bur­rows and Andy Fixmer have report­ed that “Apple Said Devel­op­ing Ad-Skip­ping as Part of TV Strat­e­gy” [link]. Patrick Seitz (@IBD_PSeitz) report­ed that at least one indus­try ana­lyst thinks the new TV will be con­trolled by users wear­ing a ring on their fin­gers [link]. And Zach Epstein (@zacharye) expands on anoth­er ana­lyst’s views and details many ways that the new Apple TV could “rev­o­lu­tionise” what it means to watch tele­vi­sion [link].

I could go on and tell you about MIT Tech­nol­o­gy Review and its dec­la­ra­tion that “Tele­vi­sion view­ers [still] fum­ble with awk­ward remote con­trols and crave a rich­er array of on-demand pro­gram­ming. It’s time for Apple to step in and dis­rupt the TV busi­ness” [link]. Or I could men­tion Richard Waters on stat­ing that “Apple must plant its flag in liv­ing room” [link]. Or send you to Bri­an Stel­ter in The New York Times who reports that Apple appears to be link­ing arms with many oth­er indus­try lead­ers to cre­ate a TV expe­ri­ence that is unri­valled [link].

I have asked my team of NextSen­sors [link] to con­sid­er the look and feel of the future of Apple TV, and we will pub­lish some of their views right here in the com­ing weeks.

Who will win the race to invent the “next” TV is uncer­tain.

What is cer­tain is that Apple’s cur­rent CEO, Tim Cook, and his top team [link] must realise that find­ing Apple’s next is not an option. Please dit­to that for you and your own com­pa­ny.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This